incestuous circle to Generate Money and Power in the Modern Language Carlos Llano (1994) in his book "Postmodernism in the Enterprise" provides a series of relationships that have taken place in our "Modern Era", which had prepared the environment to gain power and money, as the highest aspiration of human beings This periodization human mentality where there is a materialist, reductionist, with ideas of progress without limits.
operating in today's society there is an implicit bargain in which trends are converging state interventionist and liberal defense of free markets, so that the structures underpinning contemporary society resume two center pivots, the market and the state, which correspond respectively the economism and rationalism. And all that is out of official regulations (state) and trade (market) will not be anything serious or important. Market turmoil is offset by the imposition of the state order, and in turn, the bureaucratic ossification is balanced commercial freedom. It is then able to (state) and money (economy) and will therefore both state and market and each company agrees. This scheme includes a third element is the influence resulting from the use of technology and knowledge management. Then there is a homogenization to generate a single stream that flows from the unpredictable change money power, money power, influence and money (Llano, 1994, pp.9-18).
But the balance was tilting in favor of the market because the state lost legitimacy by following the neoliberal doctrine held by the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. The states lost their institutional capacity to exercise oversight and control over its population and to guarantee their collective welfare. It has been passed from a state that participated heavily in the economy, a subsidiary state and at best regulator in a very specific meaning, because it is regular for markets to operate competitively. As such, the State has a strong power but different from the strength it had in the past and has allowed the radical changes that have driven globalization. Has helped and has created the conditions to destroy many of the structures that were created in the previous accumulation mode. (Braudel, 1985, quoted in Vite, 2002, p. 52)
The idea of \u200b\u200bchecks and balances at both the political and economic, involved holding private interests, with certain constraints or limitations maintain the interest, due to the existence of institutions organized around the state. This idea was diluted when the economy and society is shaped in accordance with the interests of businessmen monopolize resources, from which it derives its power to impose a new international organization and therefore national. We have moved from a "democratically organized capitalism" to one with a minimum of regulation (Beck, 1998 cited in Vite, 2002, pp. 42, 43).
Also orthodox economic theory where neoclassical theory is, we all know as neoliberal shows its seams. The dominant school of economic thought during the Great Depression (in 1929) was, and remains so to this day, the school "neoclassical" or marginal. But in the world "neoclassical" there is no such thing as a crisis. Do not live in the real world we live in, but in a world without classes, consisting of "consumers" and "producers" a harmonious world, usually with modeling tools from mathematical physics. Their uncompromising defense of "free market" has kept alive. (Palace, Lara, & Mora, 2008, pp. 90-92)
The economy is not only economic growth but what is supposedly a complex interactive relationships that autonomized one of them can cause imbalances sooner or later pay the collapse of the whole. Therefore the objective the economic, rather than growth or development of isolated elements of this complex is to achieve more harmonious relationship possible between the elements that constitute it. An article written in 1988 by some mainstream economists and published in the newspaper orthodox economic par excellence: "Neither current forecasts specialists or contemporary analysts would have predicted series the large declines in output following the crash [of 1929] ". In other words, there was nothing in the toolbox of economic theory at the time of the Great Depression, and there is nothing in the modern version of economic theory Orthodox, allowing us to understand the nature of severe economic downturns and predict (ibid.).
Neoliberalism is a proposal which postulates the release of economic forces unleashed by the technological revolution. However, the economy left to its discretion does not exist, because the economy is mainly the result of the interaction of economic actors involved and the problem is who or who interfere with it and how they interfere.